| 
           You
      can see some common threads running through my favorite horror movies. Now
      if you were some big Hollywood director and your soul duty in life was
      making horror movies for my viewing pleasure, you'd think you had it made
      in the shade....wrong!!!! But if you add a few zombies, mixed in with some
      demons from hell and sprinkled in a werewolf or two, you would probably be
      worshipped beyond your wildest dreams. The keys to my heart are pretty
      simple, ah? Well you've seen the zombie
    movies I have on the site and the few demon pages (with more on the way),
    but now it is time to looking at what I consider the  third greatest
    werewolf movie of all-time, "An American Werewolf in London." As
    you can see this fine film ranks right behind "The Howling"
    and "The Wolf Man" on my Lycanthrope
    scale. "The Howling" and "An
    American Werewolf in London" are so similar, yet so different. They
    both set standards for the modern art of the transformation. But the 
    similarities end with the werewolves. "The Howling"
    was dark and horrific, whereas "An American Werewolf in London" (AWIL)
    was dark and comical.  Both films deliver the goods on a grand scale.  Of the two, "AWIL"
    was the first one I was exposed to and it ranks right up there with "Evil Dead 2"
    in being able to provide a perfect mixture between horror and comedy . Most
    films that do this fail in a miserable way (i.e Ghoulies, HIDEOUS, etc).
    "Dead Alive" is another 
    exception to this rule. Unlike "The
    Howling", "AWIL" played more toward the traditional theme
    of the "reluctant werewolf". This is the theme that Lon Chaney,
    Jr. helped establish and one that has served as the foundation for many
    werewolf movies. I, for one, would never be a "reluctant
    werewolf", but would use my newly found powers to clean up society. One
    can dream can't he? The transformations in "AWIL"
    were truly amazing. Where "The Howling"
    shrouded their transformations in shadows of pale blue-green lighting (which
    I think was very eerie), "AWIL" did it in well-lit room liked they
    were trying to show off their mastery of the effect. This also helped to
    expose their limitations. Rick Baker originally was hired to do the effects
    on "The Howling", but left shortly into
    the production because he knew John Landis was about to start filming "AWIL".
    The assistance that he gave Rob Bottin on "The Howling"
    was invaluable and in effect probably help make "The
    Howling's" transformation more effective and realistic. This is
    only my opinion, please e-mail
    me why you agree or disagree. One problem I have with
    "AWIL" was the use of a four-legged werewolf. The two-legged
    version just seem more menacing to me. The creature still possesses the
    strength of the wolf coupled with the derangement of mankind. Becoming the
    ultimate killing machine. But I still liked the werewolf in "AWIL"
    at least they didn't go to the extreme of making it look like normal wolves
    (i.e. "Wolfen") or put a little hair with some fake fangs and call
    it a werewolf (i.e. "Wolf").  I definitely prefer the
    two-legged variation in "The Howling"
    and "The
    Wolf Man".  Also, just saw the sequel "An American Werewolf in Paris"
    and I was very surprise. It was pretty damn good. Not as good as the original, but very
    entertaining. The werewolves were CGI (computer enhanced) and I usually don't like that,
    but in this film I did. Due out in video in May and I highly recommend it!!!!
 Checkout "The Howling" page. As always please e-mail me if you have anything you
    can add to this page, or if you have any comments, criticisms or suggestion.
   |